Why the Abortion Bans Are Objectively Bad for Women

Hannah Choe, Staff Writer

Over the past week, the abortion debate in the United States has dramatically re-emerged, as restrictive bills have been introduced in multiple states in an attempt to overturn Roe v. Wade at the Supreme Court level. Alabama recently passed the United States’ harshest abortion bill, sparking outrage and controversy across the nation. The bill completely restricts women’s right to abortions, only providing an exception for women whose lives are put in danger by the pregnancy. The bill claims to protect life yet simultaneously ruins women’s lives, forcing them to be pregnant against their own will and completely removing their autonomy and control over their own bodies.

This directly violates the Supreme Court case, Roe v. Wade, in an attempt to overturn it at the Supreme Court, which, given Kavanaugh’s recent appointment, is more likely to rule in favor of such policies than before. In order to thoroughly challenge the ruling, the bill’s only exception is made for women whose pregnancies threaten their lives, which leaves out victims of rape and incest. Should those victims get pregnant, they would be forced to carry and give birth to their abuser’s child. The emotional repercussions of the bill are simply insurrmountable– Senator Doug Jones commented on it, saying that it “uses rape victims and victims of incest at all ages, even minors, as political pawns.” Simply put: this bill goes too far. In its attempt to protect fetuses, it completely disregards the emotions and rights of women, reducing them to the vessels in which the fetus resides.

The bill dehumanizes women and forces pregnancy upon them, utterly ignoring the dangerous consequences it could yield. This decision won’t stop women from having abortions– only from having safe and legal ones. It will merely bring about the resurgence of back-alley, dangerous abortions which will threaten the lives of women, particularly those of lower economic status. While economically privileged women can travel to obtain an abortion, those without sufficient funds may turn to dangerous and antiquated methods. Should the bill be put into effect, it will only serve to intensify the divisions between economic classes and endanger the lives of women.

Moreover, the people that call themselves “pro-lifers” are, in many cases, the same ones that support the death penalty. The same ones that support the immigrant ban. The same ones that don’t care about police brutality. The same ones that are against gun control. These “pro-lifers” are not actually pro life. They are not actually in support of living, thinking humans, because if they were, they would respect the rights and choices of every woman. They would respect the lives that can and will be ruined if a woman is forced to have a child before she is emotionally or financially ready to. They would respect the fact that six weeks is not enough time for a woman to know she is pregnant, to access the necessary resources to abort it.

The Alabama abortion bill is a dangerous threat to women’s right to choose, to make decisions for their own bodies, and should it spread, it would oppress women across the United States. It violates a woman’s bodily autonomy. Whether a woman gets an abortion should be no one’s business except her own. She alone has the right to decide what to do with her body – but under Alabama’s law, the decision is no longer up to her.